for Into The Future5/15/2013 c1 sam
make another one and who is adam
make another one and who is adam
2/22/2013 c2 d706924
I love how you write this story. The characters really seem believable and I could definitely see this happening :)
I love how you write this story. The characters really seem believable and I could definitely see this happening :)
11/1/2012 c2 
54Moonspun Dragon
I really like this storyline. I hope you are not going to give up on this. Please update soon!
54Moonspun DragonI really like this storyline. I hope you are not going to give up on this. Please update soon!
6/17/2012 c2 13CircleSky
I liked the "darkest pits of hell" part the best! Funny! Thanks for writing.
13CircleSkyI liked the "darkest pits of hell" part the best! Funny! Thanks for writing.
3/15/2010 c2 15ScifigeekET
That sounds EXACTLY like Sylar and Claire. XD Too perfect. WAY too perfect. :D I'm really excited about Artemis, she looks like she could be a great character. XD
15ScifigeekETThat sounds EXACTLY like Sylar and Claire. XD Too perfect. WAY too perfect. :D I'm really excited about Artemis, she looks like she could be a great character. XD
3/15/2010 c1 ScifigeekET
Haha omigoshness that was hilarious. :D I can really see that kind of thing happening, and I REALLY love the interaction between Sylar and Peter. The Claire/Sylar thing is awesome too. Keep it up! XD
Haha omigoshness that was hilarious. :D I can really see that kind of thing happening, and I REALLY love the interaction between Sylar and Peter. The Claire/Sylar thing is awesome too. Keep it up! XD
3/3/2010 c1 43BenRG
Ah! Now this promises to be amusing. Peter Petrelli, Claire Bennet, Adam Monroe and Gabriel Grey. Consider them the Heroes version of 'Friends'. It is the year 2110 and they are still trying to get along... and not doing very well.
Your story suggests a talent for exposing the characters' hidden (and obvious) absurdities. This could be very exciting or very funny or even both. Either way, I'll be looking out for new chapters.
BenRG's Rating: 7.5/10
43BenRGAh! Now this promises to be amusing. Peter Petrelli, Claire Bennet, Adam Monroe and Gabriel Grey. Consider them the Heroes version of 'Friends'. It is the year 2110 and they are still trying to get along... and not doing very well.
Your story suggests a talent for exposing the characters' hidden (and obvious) absurdities. This could be very exciting or very funny or even both. Either way, I'll be looking out for new chapters.
BenRG's Rating: 7.5/10
3/1/2010 c1 devinj2000
this is a good story and you should keep it up. need more backstory.
this is a good story and you should keep it up. need more backstory.
3/1/2010 c1 165Gamebird
Peter is such a hypocrit!
S: "I honestly believed that that guy ran into him on purpose."
P: "So? That still doesn't give you the right to leave him there to die!"
S: "Why not? When I was a killer, you people were more than perfectly happy to leave me alone to die in my misery."
P: "Yes because you were a deadly serial killer, literally. I checked that guy's records, it was spotless."
There's a glaring flaw in Peter's logic here. If it is okay to leave people to die because they're bad people, then it is okay for Sylar to leave the guy to die because he thought the guy was a bad person. Period. What Peter *should* be getting onto Sylar about is doing shoddy research and jumping to conclusions or perhaps he should admit he was wrong to leave Sylar to die way back then.
This isn't necessarily a critique of your writing, since nearly everyone practices this sort of hypocrisy. Peter's been largely immune to it in the show, but all the other characters who try to be good have shown it in one way or another.
165GamebirdPeter is such a hypocrit!
S: "I honestly believed that that guy ran into him on purpose."
P: "So? That still doesn't give you the right to leave him there to die!"
S: "Why not? When I was a killer, you people were more than perfectly happy to leave me alone to die in my misery."
P: "Yes because you were a deadly serial killer, literally. I checked that guy's records, it was spotless."
There's a glaring flaw in Peter's logic here. If it is okay to leave people to die because they're bad people, then it is okay for Sylar to leave the guy to die because he thought the guy was a bad person. Period. What Peter *should* be getting onto Sylar about is doing shoddy research and jumping to conclusions or perhaps he should admit he was wrong to leave Sylar to die way back then.
This isn't necessarily a critique of your writing, since nearly everyone practices this sort of hypocrisy. Peter's been largely immune to it in the show, but all the other characters who try to be good have shown it in one way or another.